Practical guide

Build a daily research workflow

Use a fixed question, collection window, and stopping rule. Resolve canonical records, group commentary under primary work, rank only the changed evidence, and route selections to a research action.[1][2]

Why this gets difficult

Daily research can turn into continuous discovery, with the same paper or event arriving through databases, alerts, press releases, newsletters, and social commentary.[1][2]

A practical way through

  1. Define the research question, methods, population, and date boundary.[1][2]
  2. Collect from approved databases, journals, institutions, and specialists during one daily window.[1][2]
  3. Resolve identifiers and versions before counting work as new.[1][2]
  4. Route selected items to read, cite, test, discuss, or monitor, then close intake.[1][2]

An example

The situation: A study arrives as a preprint alert, journal notice, press release, and three newsletter links on the same morning.[1][2]

What changes: Identifiers are reconciled, publication status is recorded, and secondary discussion is attached to the canonical study.[1][2]

What you get: The queue contains one research object plus any genuinely new interpretation.[1][2]

What to watch for

  • A daily window cannot guarantee complete literature coverage.[1][2]
  • Metadata lag and version changes may require later manual correction.[1][2]

Sources worth keeping

  • Publisher, repository, DOI, and recognized database records.[1][2]
  • Primary papers and associated data or code.[1][2]
  • Specialists who identify the exact work and explain a distinct perspective.[1][2]

How Scottie helps

Scottie can monitor selected research sources, group duplicated alerts, and rank the distinct work against a disclosed research priorities.[3]

Related reading

Sources and official links

One brief, your sources

Want the morning brief without the morning scroll?

Start with 14 days free. Keep the founding rate of $15 a month if Scottie earns a place in your morning.

Try Scottie free