Newsletter comparison
The Honest Broker vs Climate-Colored Goggles
Short answer: Choose The Honest Broker to interrogate climate and weather claims. Choose Climate-Colored Goggles to evaluate solutions and public response. Keep both if your work moves from diagnosing the problem to designing an intervention.[1][2][3][4][5][6]
An independent guide. Scottie isn't affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by The Honest Broker and Climate-Colored Goggles. Each publication owns its name, writing, and subscription terms.
A brief from both newsletters · July 31, 2026
See both newsletters in one brief
See what made the brief, what didn't, and the original links behind every included story.
In this brief: Scottie kept the selected stories separate because they added different value.
Reader priorities
A policy-minded climate reader wants to test claims against data and also judge whether proposed solutions can work with public behavior and institutions.
These are illustrative priorities, not a customer’s data.
What made the brief
- The Honest Broker2 read · 2 included
- Climate-Colored Goggles2 read · 1 included
Scottie
Scottie example brief
July 31, 2026 · Executive brief
01 / The rundown
- A new open climate dashboard replaces deleted federal datasets by tracking 32 extreme weather metrics to enable data verification against IPCC benchmarks.
- El Niño conditions are suppressing Atlantic hurricane activity to 35% of normal while driving global tropical cyclone energy 29% above historical averages.
- Recent California polling reveals 59% of voters support 100% renewable targets but 59% reject paying higher electricity bills to achieve them.
02 / The briefing
01 / main
New Dashboard Replaces Deleted Federal Extreme Weather Data
The takeaway: Following the removal of over 80 EPA climate webpages in late 2025, a new independent dashboard tracks 32 variables across seven extreme weather categories. Built using official datasets, it restores public access to long-term trends evaluated against IPCC standards.
Concrete details
- Tracks 32 variables across seven weather extremes including heat waves, floods, droughts, and wildfires.
- Built in under one month using AI tools to replace deleted federal climate indicator pages.
Why it matters for this reader: This tool lets you independently verify extreme weather claims against historical records and IPCC detection standards without depending on federal agency web pages.
Original sourcesThe Honest Broker
02 / main
El Niño Suppresses Atlantic Hurricanes While Boosting Global Cyclones
The takeaway: Current 2026 data shows Atlantic storm activity running at 35% of normal while global cyclone energy sits 29% above average. This aligns with long-term patterns showing El Niño shifts cyclone energy toward the Pacific while reducing U.S. landfall damage.
Concrete details
- Median U.S. hurricane damage drops from $12 billion in La Niña years to $2 billion during El Niño.
- Global tropical cyclone energy increases by 29% during El Niño years, led by Western Pacific activity.
Why it matters for this reader: Understanding how ENSO cycles alter regional destruction patterns helps you test policy and insurance assumptions against empirical disaster and landfall data.
Original sourcesThe Honest Broker
03 / main
California Voters Support Clean Energy Goals But Reject Price Hikes
The takeaway: A new poll shows 59% of likely California voters back requiring 100% renewable electricity by 2045, yet 59% oppose paying higher rates for clean power. High power bills are also weakening support for state EV mandates.
Concrete details
- Willingness to pay extra for renewable electricity dropped from 56% a decade ago to 40% today.
- Support for California's 2035 zero-emission car mandate fell to 34%, down from 49% in 2022.
Why it matters for this reader: This data allows you to analyze how energy affordability and utility cost structures create friction between ambitious public policies and voter behavior.
Original sourcesClimate-Colored Goggles
Action items
- Explore the new extreme weather dashboard to evaluate 32 observational climate metrics against IPCC standards.
- Review historical ENSO damage data to analyze how global cyclone shifts impact regional disaster risk models.
- Examine California survey findings to evaluate how rising retail power rates influence public support for climate mandates.
See every issue behind this brief
US Extreme Weather and Climate Change Dashboard
- 🚨US Extreme Weather and Climate Change DashboardThe Honest Broker · Included
Clean Energy Costs and Colorado River Discussion
- Are Californians willing to pay for clean energy?Climate-Colored Goggles · Included
El Niño and Global Tropical Cyclone Activity
- El Niño Means Fewer Atlantic Hurricanes — But More Activity WorldwideThe Honest Broker · Included
Lake Powell Video Analysis
- Video and analysis: Lake Powell's dying daysClimate-Colored Goggles · Read, not included
The useful difference
The difference that matters
The Honest Broker concentrates on datasets, definitions, scenarios, and the calibration of extreme-weather claims. Climate-Colored Goggles concentrates on interventions, public willingness, policy design, and practical adoption.[1][2][3][4][5][6]
What each is best for
The Honest Broker
The Honest Broker contributes careful attention to baselines, scenarios, dashboards, attribution, and the uncertainty inside public climate claims.[1][2][3]
Climate-Colored Goggles
Climate-Colored Goggles contributes evidence about policy experiments, household behavior, willingness to pay, and how climate solutions land.[4][5][6]
When it’s worth reading both
The two work together when the strength of a climate claim should change the design of a policy. Scottie can keep diagnostic evidence and solution evidence separate while showing the causal connection.[1][2][3][4][5][6]